|
Meeting was called to order by President, Jeff Foster at 6:07 PM.
|
Position and Name |
Status for meeting |
|
President, Jeff Foster |
present |
|
Vice President, Nadim Nasir |
present |
|
Secretary, Barbara Garney |
present |
|
Treasurer, Kathryn Sweeny |
present |
|
Past President, Vance Barnes |
absent |
|
Director, Brad Thompson |
Absent, proxy to John Ryan |
|
Director, Jimmy Dickson |
present |
|
Director, Jack Burch |
Absent, proxy to B Garney |
|
Director, Jim Harris |
present |
|
Director, John Ryan |
present |
|
Director, Doug Kuykendall |
present |
|
Director, Mark Faggard |
Absent, proxy to Jeff Foster |
|
Director, Scott Robertson |
present |
1.
Reading of Minutes – Minutes from previous meeting will be emailed to Board,
and a vote taken.
2.
Public Forum: those present were:
Lonnie Mears
Tony Monzingo
Charlie Wilson
Jack Bauman
Johnny Meitzen
3.
Reports of Officers
a.
President – Jeff introduced new Board members, Nadim Nasir, Jimmy Dickson
and Doug Kuykendall.
b.
Vice–President – Nadim Nasir-no report at this time
c.
Secretary – Barbara Garney-no report
d.
Treasurer –Kathryn Sweeny-no report
4.
Reports of Committees: none
5.
Old
Business
a.
Presentation & finalization of “Bob Brister Youth Program with TP & W.
Jeff: TSCA started working with TP&W on a youth program-we got
started-and we got side tracked. We think the youth program is
important. At State, we created a new committee to study the program
and bring back something we can run with. Scott was to spearhead the
committee. Hopefully, all committee members had input.
Scott: We took Charlie Wilson’s plan
Texas
Junior Clays Program and
Youth Program
and
Youth
Program II and tweaked it some. Lonnie Mears and Tony
Monzingo did 95 % of the work.
#1.TP&W proposal is each club hold a shoot in conjunction with one already
scheduled for the shoot year. We agree. Problems arise with age of
participants. TP&W is changing age groups in to 3 age classes. Our
proposal is to keep age groups consistent with NSCA. There is talk to
Hunter Class and registered targets in the original program. New proposal
is eligibility is extended, no Hunter Class. Original program – Kids
winning a shoot and getting into a drawing. New proposal is trying to get
every kid in program to the State Shoot. Every Jr and Sub Jr shoots for
free at their first State Shoot, and ½ price after that. We can also
continue scholarships. We need to focus on the conclusion: administrative
burden of some things in original proposal is a problem. Figuring out ages
is a problem. We think we should make it with what we already have. We
want to see all kids involved. This program does not solve all problems but
it is a start. We need develop a grass roots program. We recommend some of
the other sporting clays associations help with the youth. Each club can
put in 600.00 we originally cane up with. Amount could be matched by
sponsors and/or TP&W. It would give us enough money to start. We can still
get private donations. The best thing would be for new kids to attend the
State Shoot. This proposal does not bridge the gap from kid never shooting
to his first time at State. We want to make the program less restrictive-a
kid can qualify by just saying they want to shoot. And it is our job to
raise the money and make sure all kids that are eligible for first time get
their entry paid, and other kids get ½ price. At lease we can help the kids
that are interested in competition while we develop a new grass roots feeder
program. I have not talked to Charlie. I do not know what he thinks of our
recommendation or what can be done. If we get a lot of entries, and do not
have the funding, we can reevaluate.
Jeff: who will administer this program?? Who will make sure we have the
money?
Charlie Wilson: I can have nothing to do with money by agency rules and
state law.
Jeff: Jim Harris previously was main support person.
Jim: Each of the 8 points has had input but I don’t not see a conclusion.
I am not prepared to take any kind of vote on what I see here if this is the
bottom line.
Jeff: Let’s open the floor for discussion. Our goal was to have something
to run with by January 1.
Jim Harris: What gets changed from original proposal to new one?
Scott: Well, first if shooter has more than 300 targets or did not shoot in
Hunter class, shooter is ineligible. New program would not have that
restriction at all. If any kid wants to be eligible, he is as long as he
fits into age category. We do not agree with separate age categories
because there is no one to administer it.
Jim: one of the keys in the original program was the 4 H group. It was one
of the keys to success.
Jeff: If TSCA is going to administer this, are we prepared to deal with 3
different age groups?
Nadim: His understanding is to get more kids to participate in NSCA
sponsored events and the State Shoot. There are feeder organizations, 4 H
and SCTP. We don’t need to invent another one. His recap:
·
Keep age groups consistent with
NSCA
·
Open program to all kids
·
Let’s raise the money for 1st
time attendees, pay their discounted fee for Main Event at State, and all
others supplement them with ½ price entry fees.
Scott: We believe we can do enough to get a large group of kids with paid
entry fees.
Lonnie: Once program is in place, committee members will go to clubs and
help start the youth programs
Jeff: Why can’t we get the range owners to come to a major club for a
meeting?
Scott: We can. That is the next step. The pilot program for grass roots
shooting and TSCA are not the same. We have the option to do something and
then allow others to feed into it.
Lonnie: Let’s go to Elm Fork or ASC and conduct a range owner’s seminar on
how to start a youth program. There is a training manual in existence. We
do not need to write one.
Charlie Wilson: throwing new kids in with seasoned competitors defeats the
whole purpose of getting more kids involved. TSCA cannot raise enough
money. He can send a lot of kids to State.
Nadim: My points:
#1 If we have the welcome problem of too many kids, then we go the
competitive aspect.
#2 We cannot become the grass roots organization. We do not have the
authority to mandate shoots.
#3 Kids are resilient – if they like it, they will come back.
Jeff: How long can kids get ½ price entry?
Scott: As long as they are junior shooters. Right now, we do not need to
go with the competitive aspect. If we have too many kids in the future, we
re-evaluate.
Kathryn: What about Nationals in the original proposal.
Scott: We can look at Nationals.
Tony: Key to getting program to the club level.
Doug: If we have more kids than money, we can get the money from the
private sector.
Nadim: His motion is:
·
Keep age groups consistent with
NSCA
·
Open program to all Texas
residents that have not attended a State Shoot in the past
·
Main Event entry fee would be no
charge for 1st time attendees. Returning attendees, including
regular shooters, Main Event entry fee will be ½ price.
Motion
seconded by John Ryan and Doug Kuykendall. Motion carried.
b. Jeff: target thieving, chip begging, whatever you want to call it
appears to have gotten at an all time high. As the sport progresses, it
will be part of the issue. We do not want to take any vote tonight. We want
Nadim to talk about his Code of Conduct and his vision for the program.
Preface
and
Code of Conduct When we meet in January, agree on a 2-3 part
plan to stop this sort of stuff. We have a couple of very high profile
shooters that have had numerous incidents. This stuff has got to stop.
Cheating to win and bullying is not right.
Nadim: No reason why we cannot elevate the image of the sport not only to
the public but to our own shooters by merely requesting proper behavior and
adequate decorum.
3
step program:
1. Have TSCA Code of Conduct letters at registered shoots. Have shooters
sign and acknowledge that they have read it and will follow the rules.
2. Develop a cadre of shooters that are referee’s that have taken the
test. They would be empowered to make rulings.
3. To develop a Sportsman of the Year program. Could help raise awareness
of sportsmanlike conduct.
Nadim: What we trying to do is create a better environment at every shoot
we attend and make shooters behave themselves.
Scott: We need to have guidelines on shoots that are self pull.
Nadim: Move that Nadim, Scott and Jimmy come up with guidelines to discuss
at January meeting. Kathryn seconded.
Motion carried.
c.
Finalize how money will be split between State Sporting and State FITASC:
Jeff: In past, gave host club 17,500 for State Shoot. Now we have added
State FITASC. Break up money into 3 specific events, prelim, main and 5
stand for Sporting. Exclude small gauge.
Proposal is:
State Sporting
$6,500 for 6 place through 10
$6,500 for trophies
Total $13,000
State FITASC
HOA $1,000
RU $ 750
Each class winner $200 including concurrent
Trophies $1,000 for HOA, RU, 1-3 in class, 1-2 concurrent
Total $4,500.
Scott: suggested a different way to spend money to help kids attend State
instead of pay out.
Scott moved that we keep the trophies for Sporting the same at 7,500 and
give 4,500 for FITASC. Hold 5,000 in reserve for kids attending State.
Cash payouts are gone.
Nadim second. Motion carried.
6.
New
Business
a.
Establish committee to create documents for Board of Director elections.
Documents are to be:
i.
One page bio on shooter including
qualifications
ii.
One page synopsis on what
candidate wants to improve and accomplish while serving TSCA
Jeff: asking 2
Board of Directors to take project. John Ryan and Mark Faggard to
take project.
b. Jeff:
calendar update. To have all ad’s sold and artwork in by Nov 15. get
calendar printed and mailed to shooters by mid/late January.
c. Set date for 2008 Board meetings: Jan 12, 2008
b.
Board of Director pictures. I can take whenever I can. Will try to get
State delegates too.
Executive Session: none
Adjourn: meeting adjourned
at 8:05 PM
|